Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Postmodern Critic - October 2006

In China, even soulless industrial centre of Shenzhen teems with more notable buildings than most flourishing cultural centres. My current favourite is the 262 m Shenzhen Special Zone Press Tower below,
pic from http://home.hetnet.nl/~hongkongphotopage/ Shenzhen/shenzhen.html

























I'm also delighted by the building in front of the fourth tallest tower in China (Shun Hing Square, in the background), which is further representative of how Chinese architects like to combine flat and curvy surfaces:
pic from same source as above






















Reinventing the spectrum of modern architecture yet again will be the twin towers due to be built in nearby Guangzhou in 2010:
pic from http://www.linternaute.com/savoir/ grands-chantiers/tours-du-monde/ guanghzou.shtml
























Traveling up to Shanghai now, the city has a virtually inexhaustible supply of postmodern architecture - just check out its skyline:
A Postmodernist's Disneyland





















Finally gravitating to the far north of China to Dalian, the port city holds its own as a theme park. Here's but a sample of its inimitable style... The Dalian Radio & TV Broadcasting Center building:
pic from http://www.skyscraperpicture.com/dalian.htm




















JInzuo Plaza~
http://www.skyscraperpicture.com/dalian.htm





















Dalian Telecommunications Building~
59
Vote
   


Original text from 'If On a Winter's Night A Traveler':

[1]
You are about to begin reading Italo Calvino's new novel, If on a winter's night a traveler. Relax. concentrate. Dispel every other thought. Let the world around you fade. Best to close the door; the TV is always on in the next room. Tell the others right away, "No, I don't want to watch TV!" Raise your voice-- they won't hear you otherwise-- "I'm reading! I don't want to be disturbed!" Maybe they haven't heard you, with all that racket; speak louder, yell: "I'm beginning to read Italo Calvino's new novel!" Or if you prefer, don't say anything; just hope that they leave you alone.
Find the most comfortable position: seated, stretched out, curled up, or lying flat. Flat on your back, on your side, on your stomach. In an easy chair, on the sofa, in the rocker, the deck chair, on the hassock. In the hammock, if you have hammock. On top of your bed, of course, or in the bed. You can even stand on your hands, head down, in the yoga position. With the book upside down, naturally.
Of course, the ideal position for reading is something you can never find. In the old days they used to read standing up, at a lectern. People were accustomed to standing on their feet, without moving. They rested like that when they were tired of horseback riding. Nobody ever thought of reading on horseback; and yet no, the idea of sitting in the saddle, the book propped against the horse;s mane, or maybe tied to the horse's ear with a special harness, seems attractive to you. With your feet in the stirrups, you should feel quite comfortable for reading; having your feet up is the first condition for enjoying a read.

Epiphanie's version:
[a]
You're about to begin reading Epiphanie Bloom's postmodern translation of 'If on a winter's night a traveler', 'Traveling Softly One Winter's Night'. Relax. Concentrate. Dispel every other thought. Let the world around you fade, and slowly tune into the sounds around you. You'll probably want to tell the people in the next room to be more considerate and lower the volume of the blaring TV. "No, I don't want to watch TV," you yell, distinctly enunciating every word. Can they be counted on to respond? "I'm reading so I don't want to be disturbed, okay?" You wish to be more specific at your reception-impaired audience: "I'm beginning to read Italo Calvino's new novel!" Maybe if you pretend they're not there, they'll go away.
Now the search begins, as it does each time- which position are you most comfortable in? Do you prefer to be seated, stretched out, curled up, or lying flat? Flat on your back, your side, or your stomach? Abandoning your last position, you stride over to an easy chair, move over to the sofa, contemplatively attempt the rocking chair, seek refuge in the deck chair, start to fiddle with the hassock... Having failed all that, you come to the bed, lying on top or crawling underneath the covers. If you're so inclined you might even stand on your head in the yoga position, reading the book upside down. It's up to you, really- you know best. You might not even have a hassock at your disposal, or a rocking chair, so the last few pieces of furniture I evoked may have only been tangible to you in an imaginary realm- but isn't that all that's accessible to begin with? You imagined cavorting around them with your new best friend in tow, humouring me, didn't you?
If you're still feeling restless after your meta/physical adventures, remember that there's no such thing as an ideal position from which to consume text- it's all a state of mind.
In the old days they used to read standing up, by a lectern, and people were accustomed to standing upright for very long hours, a welcome break from horseback riding. People wouldn't have read on horseback, in those days, although in your semi-settled position right now you start to wonder what that would be like... You can just see it now, and it's becoming more appealing the more detail you imagine it in- the book would be propped against the horse's mane or perhaps tied to a ear with a special harness, and you'd place your feet in the stirrups where they would relax into the epitome of comfort. (Is having your feet up your new prerequisite for carefree reading, now? If so, you must readjust.)
If only I could respond to each of you, you readers- but alas, my time does not permit me to take such liberties with my text, so I must address all of you under this one participle... I hope you're not too miffed. Pray continue to read, for you may deconstruct the author's reliance on this generalisation if you explore far enough. And, of course, at the end of the book (or the beginning, or the middle), you can always address me- that is me, Epiphanie Bloom, as poor Mr. Calvino has passed away and cannot participate in our adventure any more than he has in If On A Winter's Night... Let me elaborate on this point- you can, at any time, mae your own unique contribution to this story. Familiarity with IOAWNAT is preferable but not necessary. We can create a multi-authored tale, a multi-faceted adventure, perhaps even a choose-your-own-adventure.
Should I get too esoteric, exoteric, redirect my whimsical tangents with your own; send me your unique, inimitable message, and astound me with your ability to put together words and marvel at their ability to represent your hidden depths. I merely ask you for what I ask myself- an exhaustive journey through your imagination.
22
Vote
   


I find it very interesting that we only have access to one person's translation with most texts. I think the translator's role should be a lot more publicised, and their handiwork treated in a self-reflexive manner, with comments on the sides whenever possible, so that the presence of a second person to bring you the text of another is made more accessible, and celebrated.

What makes for quality translation? Is it better to search for a way to directly convey the rhythms of a language, or search for the [English] equivalent? I find that when I am reading 'If On A Winter's Night A Traveler' by Italo Calvino, translated by William Weaver I want to engage with the text by reinventing it (re-translating it) into my own understanding of fluent English. I appreciate the insight into Italian rhythms of speech that Weaver's version provides me, but I long for the text to be even more fluid in its engagement with English literature.
This is why I have taken on a project of mammoth proportions to keep me occupied in my spare time: re-writing If On A Winter's Night... to suit me.

I don't actually have the means to create the IOAWNAT I'd like to ideally, as that would include a number of different languages, and I'm only semi-fluent in Bulgarian, and my Japanese vocabulary is at beginners' level.
So I'd like you, the reader, to help me... if the text (either Weaver's original or my "second-generation English" translation) appeals to you and you can translate it into another language, please feel free to post it here at postmoderncritic.com - ideally this place can be it can be a cretive workshop.
I hope to add to the multiplicity of this book by reproducing it with my own distinctive touch. I believe it deserves to be explored in such a way, and I know I'd read another translation of it by someone else.
Now my semi-fluent grasp of Bulgarian means that I am more attuned to Italian language quirks than ppl who don't speak any European languages, but this is about all the advantage I have.
46
Vote
   


The chorus for 'Mobile' goes:

Everything's Cha-nging


[ Click here to read more ]
24
Vote
   


In reaffirming marriage as a heterosexual-only institution, heterosexuals only continue to marginalise their sexual preference by limiting their ability to grow and expand their understanding of love, sexuality and commitment. There are as many ways of loving someone as there are people, and to de-emphasise the validity of one type of love is to punish heterosexuals with the notion that their unions are somehow more tenable than that of homosexuals. Current marriage laws relegate same-sex marriage to a second-class status, which makes people like me (young bisexual/pansexual/pomosexual women) lose interest in the institution of marriage. I'm not interested in having marriage as an option if it's conditional. Heck, I'm not interested in marriage to begin with, as I'm not that interested in having my partnerships validated by third parties.
(Part of what makes heterosexuality unattractive to me is that it has an unfortunate history as ‘conventional’. Interesting as it may be, I am turned off by the baggage that accompanies romantic relations between men and women. If there’s anything being attracted to both women and men, coming out and becoming a gay rights activist has taught me, it’s that finding yourself romantically intrigued by another is a unique phenomenon, and nothing makes love more stagnant than an expectation that it should unfold within some ill-advised, society-endorsed boundaries. The people I fall in love with are people who treat every individual as a potential romantic interest, as they know that it's possible to fall in love with anyone- or anything (such as the idea of falling in love in the first place).)
Unfortunately not having access to marriage means gay couples don't have access to the same kind of financial security, the right to legally participate in the concept of 'family' or automatic go-to power in case something goes wrong, also various other sorts of services (such as the ability for your partner to immigrate via marriage if they are of a different nationality), which is why I support the idea of gay marriage... and besides, if gay people also want to buy into the idea that a formal ritual will somehow enhance/re-inforce their relationship, they should have the same right to rejoice in the social construction of marriage as is currently being afforded to straights


[ Click here to read more ]
40
Vote
   


Postmodernists On Jerry Springer

October 28th 2006 17:47
This hilarious parody of JS was brought to you courtesy of http://home.tiac.net/~cri/1999/springer.html

Postmodernists on Jerry Springer
[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
   


Films To Watch Out For

October 27th 2006 16:27
Bored with the current cinematic releases? Here's a few movies that have perked me up of late.

1. Zodiac [directed by David Fincher (Fight Club, Panic Room, Se7en), starring Jake Gyllenhaal (Jarhead, Brokeback Mountain


[ Click here to read more ]
58
Vote
   


http://www.bsnews.org/pictures/images /1153462372_bush_lotr.jpg


[ Click here to read more ]
24
Vote
   


Did you know that what is to be the world's tallest building (beginning at ground level) is being created in Dubai at this very moment? It's due to be completed in 2008, at which time it will replace not the current title-holder of Taipei 101 but the International Business Centre in Seoul, which is coming up. However, the Taipei 101 and International Business Centre will be outdone in 2012, when Dubai's next mega-skyscraper (Al Burj) is scheduled to be completed.
Here is a model of the handsome-looking Burj Dubai, which is specially designed to withstand high winds with its multi-capsule structure.

[ Click here to read more ]
26
Vote
   


What better introduction to postmodern architecture than a collection of some of the finest examples thereof?

From Los Angeles, the Walt Disney Concert Hall, designed by Frank Gehry


[ Click here to read more ]
26
Vote
   


The Enlightening Gibberish Mechanism

October 4th 2006 04:32
Here is a snippet of an essay generated by http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo:

The Absurdity of Context: Expressionism and the neotextual paradigm of expression


[ Click here to read more ]
28
Vote
   


More Posts
4 Posts
6 Posts
13 Posts
132 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

postmoderncritic's Blogs

5212 Vote(s)
162 Comment(s)
93 Post(s)
148 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
1310 Vote(s)
406 Comment(s)
12 Post(s)
470 Vote(s)
3 Comment(s)
12 Post(s)
687 Vote(s)
37 Comment(s)
10 Post(s)
117 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
40 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
89 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
2 Post(s)
0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
Moderated by postmoderncritic
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]